Every robot vacuum launch arrives with big numbers: suction in Pascals, thresholds climbed, mop water heated. The problem is that every brand prints those numbers its own way, in its own article, under its own test conditions — so side by side, they are almost impossible to compare. This page fixes the layout, not the numbers: the published figures for the robot vacuums we have covered in Australia, standardised into one table, in the same units, with the source of every figure named.
Methodology — read this first
ItsReleased does not have a test lab, and none of the figures on this page is our own measurement. Every number in the table below is a manufacturer-published figure — labelled “Brand-quoted” — collected from our own published launch coverage of that model. Each model name links to its launch page, and each row in the sources list under the table links to the exact coverage the figures came from, so you can check any figure yourself in seconds.
Why publish figures we have not measured? Because a standardised comparison of published specs is still useful — as long as you read it with this warning: brands do not all measure suction, obstacle climbing or wash temperatures the same way, and there is no single standard test every brand follows. A bigger suction number does not guarantee better cleaning on your floors, a climb figure may be quoted for a double-layer threshold rather than a single step (where we know which, the table says so), and a wash temperature is the dock’s water temperature, not a promise about hygiene outcomes. Treat this table as a spec-sheet comparison that helps you shortlist — not as a ranking of real-world performance.
Two more rules we follow on this page: if a figure was not stated in our coverage of a model, its cell stays blank (—) rather than being filled from anywhere else; and figures are printed exactly as published — no averaging, and no silent unit conversions (the one model whose climb is published in millimetres is shown in millimetres).
Robot vacuums: published specifications compared
| Model | Suction (brand-quoted) | Obstacle / threshold climb (as published) | Dock mop-wash temperature (brand-quoted) |
|---|---|---|---|
| Dreame X60 Ultra Extreme | 42,000Pa [1] | Up to 10cm [1] | 100°C [1] |
| Mova V70 Ultra Complete | 42,000Pa [2] | Up to 9cm (two-step) [2] | 100°C [2] |
| Dreame Aqua20 Ultra Roller | 40,000Pa [3] | Up to 10cm (double-layer); 5cm (single) [3] | 100°C [3] |
| DJI Romo 2 | 36,000Pa [4] | 5cm (single step); 8.5cm (double step) [4] | — |
| Roborock Saros 20 | 36,000Pa [5] | Up to 8.8cm (double-layer) [5] | 100°C [5] |
| Mova Mobius 60 | 30,000Pa [6] | Up to 8cm [6] | 100°C [6] |
| Mova Z60 Ultra Roller Complete | 28,000Pa [7] | 80mm (double step); 42mm (single step) [7] | 80°C [7] |
| Deebot X12S | 27,000Pa [8] | 2.5cm [8] | Up to 100°C [8] |
| Roborock Qrevo Curv 2 Flow | 20,000Pa [9] | — | 75°C [9] |
| Dreame X50 Ultra | 20,000Pa [10] | Up to 6cm [10] | Up to 80°C [10] |
How to read the blanks: — means that figure was not stated in our launch coverage of that model. We have left it blank rather than fill it in from anywhere else.
Sources
- Dreame X60 Ultra Extreme — figures labelled “Brand-quoted”: manufacturer-published figures as stated in our launch coverage: Dreame X60 Ultra Extreme Australia: $3,299, Launching Mid-October
- Mova V70 Ultra Complete — figures labelled “Brand-quoted”: manufacturer-published figures as stated in our launch coverage: Mova V70 Ultra Complete Australia: $3,299 Price & Verdict
- Dreame Aqua20 Ultra Roller — figures labelled “Brand-quoted”: manufacturer-published figures as stated in our launch coverage: Dreame Aqua20 Ultra Roller Australia: $3,299 Flagship First Look
- DJI Romo 2 — figures labelled “Brand-quoted”: manufacturer-published figures as stated in our launch coverage: DJI Romo 2 Australia: $2,899 Price, Release Date & Verdict
- Roborock Saros 20 — figures labelled “Brand-quoted”: manufacturer-published figures as stated in our launch coverage: Roborock Saros 20 Australia: $2,999 — Street Deals Are Over. Worth It?
- Mova Mobius 60 — figures labelled “Brand-quoted”: manufacturer-published figures as stated in our launch coverage: Mova Mobius 60 Australia: $1,999 Price & Verdict
- Mova Z60 Ultra Roller Complete — figures labelled “Brand-quoted”: manufacturer-published figures as stated in our launch coverage: Mova Z60 Ultra Roller Complete Australia: $1,399 First Look
- Deebot X12S — figures labelled “Brand-quoted”: manufacturer-published figures as stated in our launch coverage: Deebot X12S Australia: $2,999 Flagship, Worth It?
- Roborock Qrevo Curv 2 Flow — figures labelled “Brand-quoted”: manufacturer-published figures as stated in our launch coverage: Roborock Qrevo Curv 2 Flow Australia: $1,372 at Big W — the $1,044 Deal Is Dead
- Dreame X50 Ultra — figures labelled “Brand-quoted”: manufacturer-published figures as stated in our launch coverage: Dreame X50 Ultra Australia: $1,795 Cheapest Price (Clearance Ended)
Metrics we have not published here — and why
Runtime: only 2 of the 10 models above state a runtime figure in our coverage (one of them only as an approximate “up to ~200 minutes”), so a runtime column would be mostly blanks pretending to be data. Noise (dB): only 1 of the 10 models states a noise figure in our coverage. Dustbin and water-tank sizes: our coverage mixes onboard tanks and dock tanks inconsistently between models, so the numbers would not be like-for-like. A metric joins this page only when at least four models have the figure stated in their launch coverage, in comparable form.
Models whose launch coverage states none of these metrics in usable form — for example the Roborock Qrevo Edge 3 Pro, whose launch article notes that detailed specifications were not published in the coverage reviewed — are not in the table at all. An honest shorter table beats a longer one padded with guesses.
How this page grows
When a new robot vacuum launches in Australia and our coverage states its figures, it is added here with its sources. If a brand later publishes corrected specifications and our launch coverage is updated, this table follows the coverage — the source link on each row is always the version of record.